Tag: binomial nomenclature
-
Setting scicomm standards (Part 1)
The post addresses the incorrect presentation of scientific names in science communication, specifically criticising Phys.Org for failing to italicise the name “Picea abies.” This oversight is seen as detrimental to effective science writing. Mr P Cuttings emphasises the importance of adhering to proper conventions to enhance public understanding of science.
-
How unique are scientific names?
This post explores the uniqueness of scientific names, highlighting their limitations. Governed by various codes of nomenclature, these names can overlap across different groups of organisms, leading to such phenomena as hemihomony. The post also discusses tautonyms, which are not allowed in plant nomenclature, reflecting the complexities and idiosyncracies in…
-
Did Linnaeus invent binomial nomenclature?
The post discusses the origins of binomial nomenclature, often attributed solely to Carl Linnaeus. It reveals that while Linnaeus popularized and standardized the system, earlier forms existed, notably by Caspar Bauhin. The conclusion emphasizes that Linnaeus did not invent binomial nomenclature, but should be credited with its consistent application.
Plant Cuttings 