Month: January 2025
-
How unique are scientific names?
This post explores the uniqueness of scientific names, highlighting their limitations. Governed by various codes of nomenclature, these names can overlap across different groups of organisms, leading to such phenomena as hemihomony. The post also discusses tautonyms, which are not allowed in plant nomenclature, reflecting the complexities and idiosyncracies in…
-
Did Linnaeus invent binomial nomenclature?
The post discusses the origins of binomial nomenclature, often attributed solely to Carl Linnaeus. It reveals that while Linnaeus popularized and standardized the system, earlier forms existed, notably by Caspar Bauhin. The conclusion emphasizes that Linnaeus did not invent binomial nomenclature, but should be credited with its consistent application.
-
Exploring the Evolutionary Roots of Oaks
Andrew L Hipp’s “Oak Origins” explores the evolutionary history of oak trees while also addressing broader themes in biology, genetics, and ecology. Although scholarly the book is accessible to an intelligent audience, and is filled with detailed insights into oak species, their genetics, and ecological significance. The text is complemented…
-
Botanical potpourri No. 1
This post explores various plant-based topics, focusing on newly discovered species and their significance. It highlights the discovery of the “Ghost palm” and critically endangered species. Additionally, it discusses forensic botany’s role in uncovering historical uses of plants and the ecological impact of migrating butterflies potentially spreading fungal diseases.
-
Stone is dead. Long live wood!
As we look forward to 2025, Mr P Cuttings reflects on human prehistory and the correctness of the term ‘Stone Age’. Leder et al’s studies at Schöningen suggest it should be renamed the ‘Wood Age’ due to the significance of wooden tools and woodworking skills in early human development.
Plant Cuttings 